Remove about:unicorn

[jdm]

It's cute, but it's also a really large addition to an otherwise unimportant part of the spec.

[annevk]

Why not implement it? 😊

[travisleithead]

I think we need to keep it. There is precedent.

↪An end tag whose tag name is "sarcasm"
   Take a deep breath, then act as described in the "any other end tag" entry below.

http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/syntax.html#parsing-main-inbody

[mnot]

+1 to keeping it. If it ends up being removed, please consider factoring it out into a separate spec.

[calvaris]

+1 to keeping it.

[clopez]

Why is the unicorn pink?

[annevk]

Cool color. Closing this as worksforme.

[mnot]

👍🏼

/me files a bug with the Unicode Consortium due to lack of a unicorn emoji

[annevk]

That one is covered: 🦄. Well, a unicorn face.

[Ms2ger]

Features should be based on use cases or compat requirements, not stupid inside jokes. Please remove this before it causes more harm.

@travisleithead you are aware that your precedent lead to a bug in the WebKit parser, even though that, at least, was obviously not meant to have web-visible impact?

[roryhewitt]

+1 to keeping it. Well, at least if it's implemented.

[annevk]

It's not being implemented so I should probably remove it. Rather sad. I wish we'd introduce little easter eggs now and then.