-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 467
[Misc] added unit tests for apa autoscaling #1577
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @harryge00, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request significantly enhances the test coverage for the ApaScalingAlgorithm
by introducing a new set of unit tests for its ComputeTargetReplicas
function. These tests are crucial for validating the correctness and robustness of the autoscaling logic, ensuring that the algorithm accurately calculates target replica counts based on current usage, target values, fluctuation tolerances, and scaling rate limits. This enhancement improves the reliability and maintainability of the autoscaler component.
Highlights
- New Unit Test File: Added a new unit test file,
apa_test.go
, specifically for theApaScalingAlgorithm
. - Comprehensive Test Cases: Introduced a suite of test cases for the
ComputeTargetReplicas
function, covering various scenarios including no scaling within tolerance, scaling up/down beyond tolerance thresholds, and scaling limited by maximum rates. - Algorithm Validation: Verified the
ApaScalingAlgorithm
's behavior under different load conditions and configuration parameters, ensuring accurate replica computation.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds a good set of unit tests for the APA scaling algorithm. The tests cover various scenarios including scaling up, scaling down, and respecting tolerances and rate limits. My review focuses on enhancing the test suite by adding coverage for critical edge cases in the scale-down logic that could lead to bugs. I've identified issues with how MaxScaleDownRate
is handled when it's zero or less than one, and I'm suggesting new test cases to expose and help fix these vulnerabilities.
Signed-off-by: Haoyuan Ge <[email protected]>
213eef2
to
b8352cc
Compare
Pull Request Description
Added unit tests for APA autoscaling
Related Issues
Tests:

Contribution Guidelines (Expand for Details)
We appreciate your contribution to aibrix! To ensure a smooth review process and maintain high code quality, please adhere to the following guidelines:
Pull Request Title Format
Your PR title should start with one of these prefixes to indicate the nature of the change:
[Bug]
: Corrections to existing functionality[CI]
: Changes to build process or CI pipeline[Docs]
: Updates or additions to documentation[API]
: Modifications to aibrix's API or interface[CLI]
: Changes or additions to the Command Line Interface[Misc]
: For changes not covered above (use sparingly)Note: For changes spanning multiple categories, use multiple prefixes in order of importance.
Submission Checklist
By submitting this PR, you confirm that you've read these guidelines and your changes align with the project's contribution standards.