-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Implement FreshCap Handling for Classes and Objects #24136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The prefix is mapped as a normal type. It determines whether the hidden set allows to add new elements. ThisType and NoPrefix prefixes allow it, other prefixes forbid it. The pathRoot and ccOwner of a FreshCap now depend on the prefix.
Also: add another test that demonstrates some behavior relating to default parameters. Also: Rename a test so that we don't accidentally get the test file. In general, it's a bad idea to use a source file name in the compiler code for a test since we often get the wrong file when loading it into the editor.
Was cap.rd before, which was a left-over of the old model.
Refine the isField test in SymUtils to exclude non-members and phantom symbols
47fc1f9
to
dfcca31
Compare
A fresh in the capture set of a class field now causes a fresh to be added to the capture set of every instance of that class.
dfcca31
to
d2abdfe
Compare
- Drop the assertion and handle the case of empty overlap - At the same time, avoid the empty overlap by taking complete instead of direct footprints. Also: Improve printing of FreshCap prefixes
and a fresh for one of its fields.
Needed for use checking, since if we just take the leftmost prefix we sometimes end up with a `this`.
7e813cd
to
a0f1613
Compare
Private fields in publicly accessible classes that contribute fresh caps to their class still need an explicitly declared type, so that separate compilation can work.
9848c89
to
6689785
Compare
Similar to #24137 (comment) I could patch the stdlib in the same way to completely avoid untrackedCaptures: natsukagami@f638614 I made a PR: dotty-staging#73 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Some minor comments.
// so that we can compute field constributions to class instance | ||
// capture sets across compilation units. | ||
then | ||
report.error( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might be worth having a proper error message type with explanation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Eventually yes, but I did not want to claim "offiicial" error message IDs for an experimental feature.
* | ||
* 2. Marks a class field that has a cap in its capture set, so that | ||
* the cap is not contributed to the class instance. | ||
* Exampple: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* Exampple: | |
* Example: |
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
object Types { | |||
object types { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why include this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I got super annoyed that whenever I wanted to quickly load Types.scala in the IDE I got this stupid test instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How is this relevant for the PR?
This is a complete implementation of https://github.com/lampepfl/papers/pull/155. It consists of the following major parts:
Let fresh caps in field types contribute to class captures
A fresh in the capture set of a class field now causes a fresh
to be added to the capture set of every instance of that class.
This caused 18 failures in stdlib of which 2 were significant (the rest was deprecated stuff). So far, we make
this compile with the
@caps.unsafe.untrackedCaptures
annotation. #24137 explains what would be neededto fix this in a safer way.
Add prefixes to fresh caps and relate class and field fresh caps
Fresh created in classes now carry a prefix referring to the
this
of the class. The prefix gets mappedby TypeMaps, including
asSeenFrom
. We establish a "covers" relation between a fresh for an object and a fresh for one of its fields. We use the same relation for subsumption.Example:
Here the type of
a.f
isA^{a.cap2}
. Furthermorecap1
, the cap captured by the type ofa
, both covers and subsumesa.cap2
.Make sure that private fields with inferred types don't capture a fresh cap
Fields contribute fresh caps to the class. The problem is what to do with capsets in inferred types of fields. These pose problems of separate compilation. We already demand explicit declarations of capsets of non-private fields. We need to also demand an explicit declaration when a private field has an inferred capset that is not otherwise accounted for in the capset of the enclosing class. That condition can be checked post-cc, when all capsets are known. I.e. it is checked at the same time as when we check non-private fields.