Skip to content

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Initial motivation was to simplify a huge macro expansion using a tuple, since we can just use an array in #[repr(simd)] now for the same result. But also, several tests were going unnoticed during development of SIMD intrinsics because people kept looking in the wrong directory, and many are basically run-pass vs. build-fail versions of the same tests, so let's keep them close together and simplify their names, so they're easier to sift through.

Simd([u8; 64]) is now valid for repr(simd), so simplify tests with
huge tuples instead. This also found some completely untested code,
so let's just ditch that.
Mostly test/ui/simd-intrinsic -> test/ui/simd/intrinsic
Intrinsics-per-se tests moved into that folder
Repetitive names were cut short.
Duplicate names given -pass annotations.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 5, 2021
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

I guess that didn't work, eh!

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

I guess that didn't work, eh!

Is this referring to something in particular? Should I hold off on approving?

Otherwise, r=me

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Oct 10, 2021
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

Nah, I was just poking highfive and it didn't work as expected and then I foolishly deleted it out of embarrassment.
@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 10, 2021

📌 Commit 2a7b511 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Oct 10, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 10, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 2a7b511 with merge 3bf5575...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 11, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 3bf5575 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 11, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 3bf5575 into rust-lang:master Oct 11, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.57.0 milestone Oct 11, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (3bf5575): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@workingjubilee workingjubilee deleted the abbrev-shufvec-t branch March 25, 2022 02:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants