Skip to content

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

I have written code that crafts command lines for rustc, and when I get "multiple input filenames provided" it can be quite hard to figure out where in this long list of arguments the mistake is hiding. Probably I passed an argument to a flag that does not expect an argument, but which flag would that be?

This changes the error message to print the first two filenames, to make it easier to debug what is going on.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @matthewjasper

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 10, 2019
@matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 10, 2019

📌 Commit 3a3691f has been approved by matthewjasper

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 10, 2019
pietroalbini added a commit to pietroalbini/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2019
When there are multiple filenames, print what got interpreted as filenames

I have written code that crafts command lines for rustc, and when I get "multiple input filenames provided" it can be quite hard to figure out where in this long list of arguments the mistake is hiding.  Probably I passed an argument to a flag that does not expect an argument, but which flag would that be?

This changes the error message to print the first two filenames, to make it easier to debug what is going on.
Mark-Simulacrum added a commit to Mark-Simulacrum/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2019
When there are multiple filenames, print what got interpreted as filenames

I have written code that crafts command lines for rustc, and when I get "multiple input filenames provided" it can be quite hard to figure out where in this long list of arguments the mistake is hiding.  Probably I passed an argument to a flag that does not expect an argument, but which flag would that be?

This changes the error message to print the first two filenames, to make it easier to debug what is going on.
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2019
When there are multiple filenames, print what got interpreted as filenames

I have written code that crafts command lines for rustc, and when I get "multiple input filenames provided" it can be quite hard to figure out where in this long list of arguments the mistake is hiding.  Probably I passed an argument to a flag that does not expect an argument, but which flag would that be?

This changes the error message to print the first two filenames, to make it easier to debug what is going on.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2019
Rollup of 16 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #57259 (Update reference of rlibc crate to compiler-builtins crate)
 - #57740 (Use `to_ne_bytes` for converting IPv4Addr to octets)
 - #57926 (Tiny expansion to docs for `core::convert`.)
 - #58157 (Add Cargo.lock automatically adding message)
 - #58203 (rustdoc: display sugared return types for async functions)
 - #58243 (Add trait alias support in rustdoc)
 - #58262 (Add #[must_use] message to Fn* traits)
 - #58295 (std::sys::unix::stdio: explain why we do into_raw)
 - #58297 (Cleanup JS a bit)
 - #58317 (Some writing improvement, conciseness of intro)
 - #58324 (miri: give non-generic functions a stable address)
 - #58332 (operand-to-place copies should never be overlapping)
 - #58345 (When there are multiple filenames, print what got interpreted as filenames)
 - #58346 (rpath computation: explain why we pop())
 - #58350 (Fix failing tidy (line endings on Windows))
 - #58352 (miri value visitor: use `?` in macro)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 3a3691f into rust-lang:master Feb 11, 2019
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the 2nd-filename branch February 17, 2019 11:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants