fix(web): styling issues for typography in v3 #2941
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![cursor[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1210556?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
emosbaugh
approved these changes
Sep 18, 2025
JGAntunes
deleted the
jgantunes/sc-129289/it-seems-like-our-markdown-support-regressed
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fixes recent issues with typography styling introduced by #2851. Plugin setup is now different in v4, e.g. https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-forms?tab=readme-ov-file#installation
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
https://app.shortcut.com/replicated/story/129289/it-seems-like-our-markdown-support-regressed-and-isn-t-working-well-now
Does this PR require a test?
We need visual regression tests to pick up this kind of stuff.
Does this PR require a release note?
Does this PR require documentation?
NONE