Skip to content

Conversation

earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor

@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn commented Sep 29, 2025

Remove unused generation parameter from stop-the-world GC progress evaluation. Also, have shMetrics use the freeset for usage details. This is a follow up to a comment from an unrelated PR: #27456 (comment).


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8368501: Shenandoah: GC progress evaluation does not use generation (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27561/head:pull/27561
$ git checkout pull/27561

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27561
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27561/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27561

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27561

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27561.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 29, 2025

👋 Welcome back wkemper! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 29, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 29, 2025

@earthling-amzn The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 29, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 29, 2025

Webrevs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant