Skip to content

Conversation

frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #5112.

No test cases added now because it seems very weird to test that these operator new are SFINAE-unfriendly.

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja requested a review from a team as a code owner November 26, 2024 16:50
@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter added the LWG Library Working Group issue label Nov 26, 2024
@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter added the blocked on WP Waiting for a new Working Paper label Nov 26, 2024
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej added the generator C++23 generator label Dec 1, 2024
@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter removed the blocked on WP Waiting for a new Working Paper label Dec 18, 2024
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej self-assigned this Jan 7, 2025
@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

I'm mirroring this to the MSVC-internal repo - please notify me if any further changes are pushed.

@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej merged commit 76c41da into microsoft:main Jan 7, 2025
39 checks passed
@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

Thanks for implementing this LWG issue resolution! 😻 ✅ 🥳

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja deleted the lwg-3900 branch January 14, 2025 23:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
generator C++23 generator LWG Library Working Group issue
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LWG-3900 The allocator_arg_t overloads of generator::promise_type::operator new should not be constrained
3 participants