Better log message grouping #580
Merged
+23
−5
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you Viktor for your contribution! I guess that this PR need to be rebased against |
kviktor
force-pushed
the
better-log-groupping
branch
from
cb2632b to
4f1926b
Compare
|
Rebased this branch with latest |
|
@vstoykov do you think we can have a new release? Django 5.2 is also out so might nice to have a new version out saying it's supported (even tho I think it required no code change so older versions likely support it too 😅 ) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tools like sentry can group log messages based on content however if we send them as formatted each log message will have it's own entry. Python documentation also suggests this format: https://docs.python.org/3/howto/logging.html#logging-variable-data