Skip to content

Conversation

dahlbyk
Copy link
Member

@dahlbyk dahlbyk commented Jun 14, 2012

After next release...

@dahlbyk dahlbyk closed this Oct 17, 2012
@nulltoken
Copy link
Member

Why did you close it?

@dahlbyk
Copy link
Member Author

dahlbyk commented Oct 17, 2012

Repushed and it auto-closed for some reason. GitHub bug?

@dahlbyk dahlbyk reopened this Oct 17, 2012
@nulltoken nulltoken mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2012
@dahlbyk
Copy link
Member Author

dahlbyk commented Nov 3, 2012

Rebased on vNext

@dahlbyk
Copy link
Member Author

dahlbyk commented Jan 30, 2013

I have no idea if there are plans to tag a new version, but this branch has been brought up-to-date.

@nulltoken
Copy link
Member

I have no idea if there are plans to tag a new version

I've started to work on a new one ;-)

this branch has been brought up-to-date.

🎱 ‼️

@yorah
Copy link
Contributor

yorah commented Apr 3, 2013

Just missing the removal of Branch.AheadBy and Branch.BehindBy, and @nulltoken can finally merge this PR! 👍

@nulltoken
Copy link
Member

Just missing the removal of Branch.AheadBy and Branch.BehindBy, and @nulltoken can finally merge this PR! 👍

@yorah If you've got some spare time, could you please create a quick PR on top @dahlbyk's work and take care of this?

@yorah yorah mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2013
@nulltoken
Copy link
Member

Wow. This one was a long running PR, wasn't it 😉

Merged as part of #382

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants