Skip to content

Conversation

dmitry-timofeev
Copy link
Contributor

@dmitry-timofeev dmitry-timofeev commented Nov 22, 2019

Overview

The tests are not added, as they require some dependencies (and it isn't definitev if it make sense to create supervisor transactions here). The original test remains available in
015d820.


See: https://jira.bf.local/browse/ECR-3869

Definition of Done

  • There are no TODOs left in the code
  • Change is covered by automated tests
  • The coding guidelines are followed
  • Public API has Javadoc
  • Method preconditions are checked and documented in the Javadoc of the method
  • Changelog is updated if needed (in case of notable or breaking changes)
  • The continuous integration build passes

@dmitry-timofeev dmitry-timofeev added the work-in-progress 👷‍♂️ Do not expect reviewers to provide any feedback on WIP PRs — please ask for it explicitly! label Nov 22, 2019
@dmitry-timofeev dmitry-timofeev force-pushed the make-qa-service-configurable-again-ECR-3869 branch from 5035f0e to 9425dfe Compare December 2, 2019 16:44
@dmitry-timofeev dmitry-timofeev changed the title Make qa service configurable again ecr 3869 Make QA service configurable [ECR-3869] Dec 2, 2019
- It requires an active supervisor in testkit: ECR-3873
- It requires the supervisor proto-definitions (which are not
currently included in exonum-proto-sources)
@dmitry-timofeev dmitry-timofeev force-pushed the make-qa-service-configurable-again-ECR-3869 branch from 9425dfe to 28e1862 Compare December 2, 2019 17:55
@dmitry-timofeev dmitry-timofeev removed the work-in-progress 👷‍♂️ Do not expect reviewers to provide any feedback on WIP PRs — please ask for it explicitly! label Dec 2, 2019
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 2, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.08%) to 85.871% when pulling fccd484 on dmitry-timofeev:make-qa-service-configurable-again-ECR-3869 into f0dd195 on exonum:master.

updateTimeOracle(fork, configuration);
}

private void checkConfiguration(InitialConfiguration config) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we rename InitialConfiguration if it's not necessarily initial?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good observation, thanks, let it be QaConfiguration.

(@ivan-ochc — see the patches to the specification: https://wiki.bf.local/pages/viewpreviousversions.action?pageId=1710016)

@dmitry-timofeev dmitry-timofeev merged commit 9adb4b9 into exonum:master Dec 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants