java benchmark #1985
java benchmark #1985
Conversation
|
Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action |
|
Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS |
|
Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action |
|
Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS |
|
Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action |
|
Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS |
| /** | ||
| * Run a single batch put-get cycle and measure performance | ||
| */ | ||
| public Result runItemEncryptorCycle(final byte[] data) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Question: This method appears to never read from nor write to a DynamoDB table.
But the README suggests that DDB Local is a requirement, and that a DDB table is required, as one is created.
Can we remove the DDB table creation and DDB local dependency?
| - Local DynamoDB instance running on localhost:8000 | ||
| - Access to AWS Database Encryption SDK for DynamoDB Java libraries | ||
|
|
||
| ## Local DynamoDB Setup |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: I do not think Local DynamoDB is required.
| Create the test table: | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| aws dynamodb create-table \ | ||
| --table-name db-esdk-performance-test \ | ||
| --attribute-definitions \ | ||
| AttributeName=partition_key,AttributeType=S \ | ||
| AttributeName=sort_key,AttributeType=N \ | ||
| --key-schema \ | ||
| AttributeName=partition_key,KeyType=HASH \ | ||
| AttributeName=sort_key,KeyType=RANGE \ | ||
| --billing-mode PAY_PER_REQUEST \ | ||
| --endpoint-url http://localhost:8000 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: I do not think this DDB table is required.
| ### Batch Operations | ||
| - Performs BatchWriteItem operations with 25 items per batch | ||
| - Measures BatchGetItem operations with consistent reads | ||
| - Tests realistic DynamoDB workloads with encryption overhead |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: I did not see any DDB Batch operations... is the AI going wild?
| ### DB-ESDK Integration | ||
| - Uses AWS Database Encryption SDK for DynamoDB with transparent encryption | ||
| - Configures attribute actions (ENCRYPT_AND_SIGN, SIGN_ONLY, DO_NOTHING) | ||
| - Tests actual DynamoDB operations with client-side encryption |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: I did not see any actual DDB operations, just the Item Encryptor.
|
|
||
| - Java 17 or higher | ||
| - Maven 3.6 or higher | ||
| - Local DynamoDB instance running on localhost:8000 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: I do not think that Local DynamoDB is required.
| - Java 17 or higher | ||
| - Maven 3.6 or higher | ||
| - Local DynamoDB instance running on localhost:8000 | ||
| - Access to AWS Database Encryption SDK for DynamoDB Java libraries |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: This wording is very odd.
| import me.tongfei.progressbar.ProgressBar; | ||
| import software.amazon.awssdk.core.client.config.ClientOverrideConfiguration; | ||
| import software.amazon.awssdk.core.SdkBytes; | ||
| import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.DynamoDbClient; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: This is an un-used import... in fact... almost all of these DDB service imports are un-used... what is going on?
Why are there un-needed imports?
2 participants
Issue #, if available:
Description of changes:
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.