Skip to content

Conversation

yamt
Copy link
Contributor

@yamt yamt commented Apr 16, 2025

No description provided.

@abrown
Copy link
Collaborator

abrown commented Jun 2, 2025

In talking to @alexcrichton, @sbc100, @sunfishcode: this seems like a reasonable change given the state of LLVM 20. We were confused by the phase3 nomenclature; can we swap that out with legacy? It would also be good to add some more context to warn users about relying on this, since LLVM 21 may make this obsolete.

@yamt
Copy link
Contributor Author

yamt commented Jun 2, 2025

In talking to @alexcrichton, @sbc100, @sunfishcode: this seems like a reasonable change given the state of LLVM 20. We were confused by the phase3 nomenclature; can we swap that out with legacy? It would also be good to add some more context to warn users about relying on this, since LLVM 21 may make this obsolete.

thank you. i added some text to make it clearer.

@abrown abrown merged commit 38c9744 into WebAssembly:main Jun 5, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants