Delete AppVeyor config #8639
Merged
Delete AppVeyor config #8639
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RDIL
requested review from
PaulHigin,
TravisEz13,
adityapatwardhan,
anmenaga and
daxian-dbw
as code owners
adityapatwardhan
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2019
TravisEz13
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2019
daxian-dbw
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2019
daxian-dbw
added
the
CL-CodeCleanup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Summary
Since we aren't using AppVeyor anymore (at least I think we aren't), why have its config still exist?
PR Context
I don't think we are using AppVeyor anymore
PR Checklist
.h,.cpp,.cs,.ps1and.psm1files have the correct copyright headerWIP:or[ WIP ]to the beginning of the title (theWIPbot will keep its status check atPendingwhile the prefix is present) and remove the prefix when the PR is ready.[feature]to your commit messages if the change is significant or affects feature tests