drm/sched: stop passing non struct drm_device to drm_err() and friends

The expectation is that the struct drm_device based logging helpers get
passed an actual struct drm_device pointer rather than some random
struct pointer where you can dereference the ->dev member.

Convert drm_err(sched, ...) to dev_err(sched->dev, ...) and
similar. This matches current usage, as struct drm_device is not
available, but drops "[drm]" or "[drm] *ERROR*" prefix from logging.

Unfortunately, there's no dev_WARN_ON(), so the conversion is not
exactly the same.

Reviewed-by: Simona Vetter <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Philipp Stanner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Louis Chauvet <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/fe441dd1469d2b03e6b2ff247078bdde2011c6e3.1737644530.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Author: jnikula

drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c

@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int drm_sched_entity_init(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
 		 * the lowest priority available.
 		 */
 		if (entity->priority >= sched_list[0]->num_rqs) {
-			drm_err(sched_list[0], "entity with out-of-bounds priority:%u num_rqs:%u\n",
+			dev_err(sched_list[0]->dev, "entity has out-of-bounds priority: %u. num_rqs: %u\n",
 				entity->priority, sched_list[0]->num_rqs);
 			entity->priority = max_t(s32, (s32) sched_list[0]->num_rqs - 1,
 						 (s32) DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL);

drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c

@@ -102,9 +102,9 @@ static u32 drm_sched_available_credits(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 {
 	u32 credits;
 
-	drm_WARN_ON(sched, check_sub_overflow(sched->credit_limit,
-					      atomic_read(&sched->credit_count),
-					      &credits));
+	WARN_ON(check_sub_overflow(sched->credit_limit,
+				   atomic_read(&sched->credit_count),
+				   &credits));
 
 	return credits;
 }
@@ -129,9 +129,11 @@ static bool drm_sched_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
 	/* If a job exceeds the credit limit, truncate it to the credit limit
 	 * itself to guarantee forward progress.
 	 */
-	if (drm_WARN(sched, s_job->credits > sched->credit_limit,
-		     "Jobs may not exceed the credit limit, truncate.\n"))
+	if (s_job->credits > sched->credit_limit) {
+		dev_WARN(sched->dev,
+			 "Jobs may not exceed the credit limit, truncate.\n");
 		s_job->credits = sched->credit_limit;
+	}
 
 	return drm_sched_available_credits(sched) >= s_job->credits;
 }
@@ -789,7 +791,7 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
 		 * or worse--a blank screen--leave a trail in the
 		 * logs, so this can be debugged easier.
 		 */
-		drm_err(job->sched, "%s: entity has no rq!\n", __func__);
+		dev_err(job->sched->dev, "%s: entity has no rq!\n", __func__);
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
 
@@ -1263,15 +1265,15 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, const struct drm_sched_init_
 	if (args->num_rqs > DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT) {
 		/* This is a gross violation--tell drivers what the  problem is.
 		 */
-		drm_err(sched, "%s: num_rqs cannot be greater than DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT\n",
+		dev_err(sched->dev, "%s: num_rqs cannot be greater than DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT\n",
 			__func__);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	} else if (sched->sched_rq) {
 		/* Not an error, but warn anyway so drivers can
 		 * fine-tune their DRM calling order, and return all
 		 * is good.
 		 */
-		drm_warn(sched, "%s: scheduler already initialized!\n", __func__);
+		dev_warn(sched->dev, "%s: scheduler already initialized!\n", __func__);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -1326,7 +1328,7 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, const struct drm_sched_init_
 Out_check_own:
 	if (sched->own_submit_wq)
 		destroy_workqueue(sched->submit_wq);
-	drm_err(sched, "%s: Failed to setup GPU scheduler--out of memory\n", __func__);
+	dev_err(sched->dev, "%s: Failed to setup GPU scheduler--out of memory\n", __func__);
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_init);